LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:20:12 -0800
Reply-To:   "Self, Karsten" <Karsten.Self@SCHWAB.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Self, Karsten" <Karsten.Self@SCHWAB.COM>
Subject:   Re: Hospital revenue codes
Comments:   To: Frank Schiffel <SchifF@MAIL.HEALTH.STATE.MO.US>
Content-Type:   text/plain

> ---------- > From: Frank Schiffel[SMTP:SchifF@MAIL.HEALTH.STATE.MO.US] > Reply To: Frank Schiffel > Sent: Monday, January 25, 1999 10:56 AM > To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Hospital revenue codes > > CPT codes are procedure codes, usually used in an outpatient setting. AMA > is responsible for them. > > ICD-9 codes have diagnosis and procedures and are the standard for coding > them. American Hospital Association is one publisher. > > neither are revenue codes. > > perhaps you are refering to DRGs, or diagnosis related groups and how that > is paid by HCFA? > Hospital Revenue Codes are part of the UB-92 form specification (in a loosely defined sort of a way). I believe UB-92 is specified by Medicare, aka HCFA. Grubbing around their web site might produce something of interest. Hmmm... no, looks like there's a third party involved, see links below.

More information is available here: (http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/edi5.htm), search for 'HCFA-11450 (UB-92)' in the page.

A full specification of the UB-92, including rev codes, is here: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/edi/3604.pdf

> -- > Karsten M. Self (Karsten.Self@schwab.com) > Trilogy Consulting > > What part of "gestalt" don't you understand? > > WARNING: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received by the > Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival and > review by someone other than the recipient. > > This communication does not necessarily reflect the views or position of > The Charles Schwab Corporation, or any of its subsidiaries or their > affiliates. > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page