LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:57:53 -0500
Reply-To:   emaguin@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:   Gene Maguin <emaguin@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU>
Subject:   Re: case matching/examining date
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Would you be kind enough to elaborate your thinking behind the following paragraph of your reply to Cindy (Earthstars). In particular, when you would and would not use a matched analysis.

>You want that kind of analysis when the pairs are SIBS, for instance, but not (in my opinion) for most other matches. >Instead, you can control for the important covariate by entering it as a covariate, or by using it as a factor in the >ANOVA design.


Gene Maguin

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page