LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1999)Back to main GABO-L pageJoin or leave GABO-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:37:56 -0500
Reply-To:     Jim Ozier <Jim_Ozier@MAIL.DNR.STATE.GA.US>
Sender:       Georgia Birders Online <GABO-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jim Ozier <Jim_Ozier@MAIL.DNR.STATE.GA.US>
Subject:      International Paper HCP (fwd) -Reply
Comments: To: bergstrm@VALDOSTA.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain

Robert Bonnie's (EDF) note on RCW HCPs contained some good information, but I believe his reference to the Georgia statewide RCW HCP was misleading. His criticism of RCW HCPs in general was directed mainly to take of demographically isolated birds on private land with mitigation on public land, and he lauds the IP HCP because it mitigates on private land. Yet, he boasts of not letting the Georgia HCP "see the light of day," and the Georgia HCP is very similar to IP's -- take of demographically isolated birds is to be mitigated on private land. There has been some disagreement over determination of demographic isolation as well, but further data analysis has supported what was evident all along -- small isolated populations of RCWs will not persist. Our plan to salvage disappearing demographically isolated RCWs and build a viable mitigation population on private land has been delayed (not seen the light of day) for about 3 years because of what appears to have been misguided opposition. In those 3 years, it is likely that several demographically isolated groups of woodpeckers were lost forever and will not be replaced.

Jim Ozier Georgia DNR Forsyth


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main GABO-L page