LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:53:09 -0500
Reply-To:     Lary Jones <ljones@BINGHAMTON.EDU>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Lary Jones <ljones@BINGHAMTON.EDU>
Subject:      Appropriate design: measures of factor
Comments: To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Statis-tickle wizards:

A PhD student in psychology came to me today with a question about how to impliment a design in GLM. This question is really about choices in the design, not so much a question of software options. For purposes of this question let's say that there are:

Between Groups Factors: Gender Hi-Lo on X Within Subjects 5 sessions or trials

During each one of the sesions/trials the subjects make a number of responses. The dependent measure(s) are the counts of response type A and response type B.

It is unclear to me whether it is better to make this another W/S factor (response type), or treat these as multivariate "measures" taken at each trial. Making this a factor does allow for the direct testing of interactions with other factors. Treating this as "measures" means one would look at the discriminant function of the measures for interpretation.

Which way would you go?

If I am not makeing the problem clear, please let me know, and I will try again.

TIA, Lary Jones _______________________________________________________ Lary Jones % Statistical Computing Analyst Computing Services % .......................... Binghamton University % LJones@Binghamton.EDU Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 % (607) 777-2879


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page