LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (March 1999, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 9 Mar 1999 17:32:25 -0500
Reply-To:     HERMANS1 <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         HERMANS1 <HERMANS1@WESTAT.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS vs. Oracle
Comments: To: Jesse Chittams <jchittam@CCEB.UPENN.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I prefer Oracle in situations where you need to define derived variables using a SQL view of many related tables requiring many indexes. SAS performs better where one needs to scan linked tables one record at a time, particularly when importing data from external files. SAS also has a much richer collection of format, informats, and functions than Oracle. I have a strong preference for SAS where data sources may not conform at least to the primary key and referential integrity constraints, or require fuzzy matching on keys. Sig ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: SAS vs. Oracle Author: Jesse Chittams <jchittam@CCEB.UPENN.EDU> Date: 3/9/99 3:35 PM

Hello,

Has anyone compared SAS and Oracle on UNIX regarding, merging large data sets (millions of records and hundreds of variables), and deriving variables base on complex criteria?

Thanks, -Jesse Chittams


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page