LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1999, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:28:32 +0000
Reply-To:     John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM>
Subject:      Re: Licensing Costs Again; WAS: Yet more thoughts on SAS for Linux
Comments: To: Mark S Dehaan <MSD@INEL.GOV>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 16:06 10/03/99 -0700, Mark S Dehaan wrote:

>I don't think there is anyone out there who wouldn't prefer a reasonable >"one-time" non-expiring purchase plan for SAS. But as I experienced in >pursuing the perpetual Gov't Contract route, what is reasonable to SAS may >not be reasonable to the user. In my analysis it seemed that SAS worked it >out so that you would end up paying the about the same no matter which way >you went if you considered obsolescence of an OS. We thought of paying once >for a perpetual license with the idea of not upgrading for 10 or more years >(which would be one $ saving approach), but what OS is gonna be around and >suitable 10 yrs from now?

Suitable for what? If you felt able to say that today's release of SAS would still be adequate for you in 10 years' time, then why not also the OS? MS-DOS 2.x will, as far as I know, run on a Pentium III (or the mainframe equivalent situation)!!

In any event, my point was that most people, certainly serious commercial customers are *not* going to think that there present version of SAS will still be 'satisfactory' for them in 10 years' time; they are far more likely to want to upgrade (or even change OS!) in 2-3 years, I reckon - so it would be reasonable for SI to set the financial 'break-even' point for a perpetual licence fee around that sort of duration.

>Perhaps if SAS goes public as rumored it will also get a more user friendly >pricing paradigm?

Only if someone is sensible enough to see that as a means of expanding the market, leading to greater profits in the medium/long-term. If the shareholders demand immediate profits, I could well see the changes going in the opposite direction!



---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK ----------------------------------------------------------------

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page