LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1999, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:54:08 -0500
Reply-To:     Kattamuri.Sarma@RESPONSEINSURANCE.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Kattamuri S. Sarma" <Kattamuri.Sarma@RESPONSEINSURANCE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Doable regression?
Comments: To: ECON <joylin@MS2.SEEDER.NET>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I suggest that first you separate the housbands' records from spouse record . rename the wife's characterestics with a prefix. Then merge by household id only. Both husband and wife belong to the same household (in most cases). Then run your regression. It should work. I am assuming that you have only two types of records (husband and wife, not son or other member). If not you have to separate them also .

Since you are merging by household id as well as order (individual id ?), you are seeing many missing values..


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page