LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 22 Apr 1999 14:11:01 GMT
Reply-To:     jpwinter@UMSL.EDU
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         jpwinter@UMSL.EDU
Organization: University of Missouri - St. Louis
Subject:      Re: Bug in the Select If Statement

Just as an aside, are you sure you have cases with vis_date = 3,31,1999? I can't really think of another reason (although perhaps the time-theory people are onto something).

BTW, I didn't think SPSS had variable names longer than 8 characters.

On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 16:00:23 -0400, Claudio Capone <Ccapone@HARTHOSP.ORG> wrote:

: Hello, : : I just discovered that the following syntax was not performing as I had = : expected it to. : : FILTER OFF. : USE ALL. : SELECT IF(visit_date >=3D DATE.MDY(1,1,1999) & visit_date <=3D DATE.MDY(3,= : 31,1999)). : EXECUTE . : : It drops any records with the date of 3/31/1999. I thought <=3D includes = : the date. Can anyone tell me why this might be happening? : : Thanks in advance for your help. : : Claudio A. Capone : Data Analyst : Value Enhancement Team : Hartford Hospital : ccapone@harthosp.org


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page