LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sat, 24 Apr 1999 11:31:14 +0200
Reply-To:   Albert Bonillo <abonillo@METODO.UAB.ES>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:   Albert Bonillo <abonillo@METODO.UAB.ES>
Subject:   RV: IC 95% of the median in KM procedure
Content-Type:   multipart/alternative;

I made a Kaplan-Meier estimation survival's time. When I compared the ouput generated for SPSS 8.0 and BMDP PC90 I could see the great difference in the estimation of the 95% confidence interval of median: with the same data file, BMDP estimate the confidence interval about:

MEDIAN (50TH) 218.00 114.86

MEDIAN SURVIVAL TIME (85.00 , 392.00)

and SPSS ouput

Median: 218 115 ( 0, 443 ).

The rest of the ouput is equal in the two statistical packages.

What causes these differences?. How SPSS estimates the confidence interval of the median in the KM procedure?. I have read the Advanced Statistics Handbook of SPSS and there is not information about this estimation.

----------------------------------------------------- Albert Bonillo Martín abonilloX@metodo.uab.es

Universitat Auṭnoma de Barcelona -----------------------------------------------------

Remove the "X" in the email adress


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page