LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1999, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 27 Apr 1999 14:36:09 -0400
Reply-To:     Michael Davis <michael@BASSETTCONSULTING.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Michael Davis <michael@BASSETTCONSULTING.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS Certification
In-Reply-To:  <s725a59a.039@email.firsthealth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:44 AM 04/27/1999, Jack Hamilton <JackHamilton@FIRSTHEALTH.COM> wrote:

>The problem I see with the certification tests is not that they exist but >we have no confidence in them. As far as I know, they're not peer reviewed >- >no one on SAS-L, at least, has admitted to being consulted about the >usefulness of the questions or the correctness of the suggested answers. >From what I've heard, some of the test questions *are* useless and some of >the answers *are* arguably incorrect. The fact that SAS Institute >participated in the creation of the tests does not, by itself, mean that >the tests are valid.

As an aside, the beta testers at SUGI were consulted after the fact. As we took the test, we were afforded the ability to type in comments about the questions. I was sitting next to S. David Riba and his keyboard and heard him comment up a storm <g>. Also, the folks at SI involved with the certification program were immediately outside the test area and were interested in any comments we cared to share upon exiting the room.

For the record (and at some risk since I will not receive my score for another month or so), my opinion of the test was that it was a fair examination of my knowledge of the SAS language. There were more questions on the TABULATE procedure than I had prepared for but then again, I probably was more comfortable with the access and view descriptors than some other folks that don't work with the SAS/ACCESS products. I suspect it all comes out in the wash.

Does certification measure anyone's ability to solve typical business problems? Maybe not but such a test is much further down the road and we may never get there. Will certification results be abused and misinterpreted? Perhaps but that is the danger of categorizing any information.

I suspect that deep-down, much of the hostility over SAS certification is the notion that someone else is attempting to pass judgement over how good a SAS'er you may be. My view is that it is useful information for myself and others to have about my abilities. However, it is only one piece of testimony as to whether I would be a good resource to enlist in the cause of advancing a SAS project.

- Michael "Mad Doggy" Davis

-----------------------------

Michael L. Davis Vice President Bassett Consulting Services, Inc. 10 Pleasant Drive North Haven CT 06473-3712 Internet: michael@bassettconsulting.com Web: http://www.bassettconsulting.com Telephone: 203-562-0640 Facsimile: 203-498-1414 Messages: 888-477-1412


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page