LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1999, week 5)Back to main CONCH-L pageJoin or leave CONCH-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:49:37 -0400
Reply-To:     Conchologists of America List <CONCH-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Sender:       Conchologists of America List <CONCH-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Kay Lavalier <liavik@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: Cephalopod Info/ Bite Marks
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Andrew Vik Tampa, FL., USA liavik@earthlink.net

Andrew R.:

I was the one who first broached the subject of marine saurian predation on ammonites. I cannot remember the source, but the book I saw had a very convincing illustration of the V-shaped bite mark of a mosasaur in the shell of a large discoidal ammonite. There were six holes, arranged as follows: . . . . . .

This seems to me to be too symmetrical to have been caused by six different limpets (there were also tooth marks on the reverse side). I will see if I can re-locate this source.

Andrew V.

Andrew K. Rindsberg wrote:

> Some time ago, Nora Bryan wrote about the difficulty of distinguishing > limpet scars from bite marks on fossil ammonites. Erle Kaufmann interpreted > the holes as punctures made by mosasaurs in the 1960's. Recently, Kase and > others (including Dolf Seilacher) convincingly showed that some holes on > ammonites are limpet scars in: > > Kase, T., Johnston, P. A., Seilacher, A. & Boyce, J. B. 1998. Alleged > mosasaur bite marks on Late Cretaceous ammonites are limpet > (patellogastropod) home scars. Geology, 26(10): 947-950. > > What you have to realize is that the eminent researchers did not study the > same ammonites, though they did work on specimens from the same age and > formation. Seilacher wanted to examine Kaufmann's ammonite, but this > specimen was lost several years ago, so it is no longer available for > study. If it has mosasaur bite marks, no one can tell for sure now. It > could be that they are both right in different cases. As Walt Whitman said > (more or less), "And if I contradict myself, very well, I contradict > myself. I am large; I contain multitudes." Nature might say the same. > > David Schwimmer (the REAL vertebrate paleontologist living in Columbus, > Georgia, not the actor on "Friends") has documented bite marks of sharks in > Cretaceous dinosaur bones. He can distinguish marks made in "green" bone > (that is, fresh bone) and in old, brittle bone. As to whether sharks made > the holes, he has excellent evidence: Some of the holes have shark teeth in > them. Sharks shed their teeth frequently and they sometimes rip out while > they are feeding. > > Andrew K. Rindsberg > Geological Survey of Alabama > Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main CONCH-L page