| Date: | Fri, 30 Apr 1999 18:08:21 +0100 |
| Reply-To: | John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | John Whittington <medisci@POWERNET.COM> |
| Subject: | Re: SAS Certification |
|
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
|---|
At 11:41 27/04/99 -0500, Gullion Christina wrote (in part):
>I don't think grandfathering is suitable for SAS programming credentials.
It's certainly not ideal. However, whenever one introduces a new
'qualification' into an established field, one has little choice but to
allow 'grandfathering' - otherwise (since those long-established in a field
will rarely be happy to subject themselves to 'examination') you end up with
the silly situation in which all the good and experienced folk are
'unqualified' and the only 'qualified' ones are those with virtually no
experience. ... that's why it really takes 'a generation' before any new
qualification starts to be properly meaningful. In the early days of the
intervening period, at least potential employees generally know that
'qualified/certified' generally means 'inexperienced'!!
Kind Regards,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: medisci@powernet.com
Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
|