LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (June 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:25:41 -0700
Reply-To:     glaser@pacific-science.com
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dale Glaser <glaser@PACIFIC-SCIENCE.COM>
Subject:      massed data to individual records
In-Reply-To:  <C02FEF109018D3118C9900A024CDCB6476E3B9@HERMES>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Possibly there is some easy algorithm to get at the following, but my perusal of Defining Complex Files in the Base Manual did not quite get at what I need....any help greatly appreciated:

I have received data as follows:

Subject sup4 notsup4 ambig4 sup2 notsup2 ambig2 1 0 0 4 2 0 0 2 0 1 3 1 1 0 3 1 1 2 2 0 0

sup=support notsup=not support amibig=ambiguous

The numbers following the ascription in the variable name are the number of scenarios presented....I won't delve into the experimental context, but in a nutshell subject #1 receives four descriptions of a scenario, of which they rate each description as either being supporting, not supporting, or ambiguous; this is a completely within-subject design, so in this sample of data, subject #1 was presented with four situations and rated four as being ambiguous; subsequently they are given two situations (related to the same scenario) and rate them again (in this instance s#1 rates them both as being supportive); the above datapoints are for one scenario, so they actually had 4 scenarios each........we were interested at looking at the type of scenario x rating interaction (e.g., 4 x 3 chi-square), however, beyond the experimental logistics that may advise against this type of analysis (i.e., nonindependence of data), this analysis was mainly a check after the fact to see if any descriptions are particularly problematic (i.e., ambiguous); well, unfortunately the data came to me in the above fashion meaning it was aggregated with each cell representing a sum (e.g., subject #3 said two descriptions were ambiguous for the '4' condition [ambig4]), instead of being true count data; I know how to use syntax to convert multiple records into one (e.g., vector outside a loop structure), but I am having troubles using some type of 'repeating data' command to create multiple records for each subject, and be able to convert the massed count for each cell into a RATING type variable, as described below......so, ideally my data should look like the following (for one subject and two contiguous scenarios):

RATING Support=1 Not support=2 Ambiguous=3

SCENARIO 4 descriptions=1 2 descriptions=2

Subject Rating Scenario 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 2

Are there any aggregate or looped commands that may remediate my perpelexity?

Thank you for any assistance

Dale Glaser, Ph.D. Pacific Science & Engineering/SDSU San Diego, CA


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page