LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 5 Aug 1999 17:08:20 +0200
Reply-To:     Hanna Zaremba <h.zaremba@CBOS.PL>
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Hanna Zaremba <h.zaremba@CBOS.PL>
Subject:      discriminant analisis-assumption
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Dear list membrs, I was wondering if someone could answer my questin. I perform discriminant analisis first time and i am not sure if my data met discriminant assumptin. How to interpret Box'M test? Does 59.89% of "grouped" cases correctly classified: is enought or not?

I obtain such results:

Test of equality of group covariance matrices using Box's M

The ranks and natural logarithms of determinants printed are those

of the group covariance matrices.

Group Label Rank Log Determinant

1 10 12.390219

5 10 8.829367

8 10 10.435928

11 10 9.483442

Pooled Within-Groups

Covariance Matrix 10 11.639970

Box's M Approximate F Degrees of freedom Significance

386.77 2.2096 165, 98413.3 .0000

Classification Results -

No. of Predicted Group Membership

Actual Group Cases 1 5 8 11

-------------------- ------ -------- -------- -------- --------

Group 1 136 87 1 32 16

64.0% 1.1% 23.4% 11.5%

Group 5 48 12 4 31 1

25.6% 7.6% 64.1% 2.6%

Group 8 188 28 1 156 4

14.7% .4% 82.7% 2.1%

Group 11 61 22 0 26 13

35.6% .0% 42.6% 21.9%

Percent of "grouped" cases correctly classified: 59.89%

Thanks,

Hanna

Hanna Zaremba, CBOS


[text/html]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page