LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 1999)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 5 Nov 1999 17:24:50 -0500
Reply-To:     emaguin@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
Sender:       "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         emaguin@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
Subject:      Modifying correlation output to waste less space
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Listmembers,

I have been doing some correlations where I do a Split file command then Correlations. My question is whether anyone has any practical tricks or scripts to make the output more compact. Printing on 8.5x11 portrait orientation i get TWO columns of correlations per page. When i look at the printed page, i see red. I find this appalling!!

I currently have Edit-->Options-->Pivot Table set to display variable names and label. Changing this would probably get an additional column. However, changing that option would, i believe, also cause display names and labels to not be displayed on Frequencies. I find them informative there and want to keep them. The correlation columns' width is about right to display an eight character variable name without wrapping, so narrowing those seems out of the question. I know i could gain another column by forgetting the Split files command and using a Temporary/Select if arrangement.

The only thing i can think of is to either modify the existing correlation script somehow or to use a custom script to modify the output to be more compact. Others of you must have been annoyed by this. Have you found anything to change to get more space? Is a custom script the only answer? Has anyone written one that they would be willing to share?

Thanks, Gene Maguin


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page