MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johnnie Sutherland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ernest L Woodson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 15:31:04 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:26:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ernest L Woodson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Queen cities (geotrivia) (fwd)



  Hello geographers, I lived in New Orleans in the
  60's and I never heard it called Queen city. I have
  heard of the Cincy one, but the real Queen City is
  Buffalo, which was and is calle Queen City of the Lakes.
       Ernie Woodson  University at Buffalo

On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Johnnie Sutherland wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 02:36:50 CDT
> From: Joseph McCollum <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Queen cities (geotrivia) (fwd)
>
> My encyclopedia agrees that New Orleans is the Queen City of the
> Mississippi and Cincinnati is the Queen City of the West.  In 1850,
> Cincinnati and New Orleans had much larger populations than Detroit,
> Chicago, or St. Louis.  I don't know when they acquired the name "Queen
> City," but it would appear that "second largest" is not the explanation.
>
--- End Forwarded Message ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2