--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:06:40 -0400
From: Scott McEathron <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Cataloging manuscript maps <fwd>
Sender: Scott McEathron <[log in to unmask]>



Fran,

Your record looks very good.  For the physical dimensions area you only need
"cm." after the last number (66 x 64 cm.). If you are submitting your
records to a online union catalog such as OCLC, you need to insure you
complete the 007, 034 and 052 MARC fields. -Scott M.
______________________________________________________
Scott R. McEathron
Map Catalog Librarian
Liaison Librarian to Geology and Geophysics, and
Natural Resources Management and Engineering
University of Connecticut
University Libraries
369 Fairfield Road
Storrs, CT 06269-1005
(860) 486-6807
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnnie Sutherland [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Cataloging manuscript maps <fwd>


--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 13:11:25 -0400
From: frances pollitt <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Cataloging manuscript maps
Sender: frances pollitt <[log in to unmask]>




I am cataloging a map collection at the Maine Historical Society called the
Pejepscot Maps. They are from the 1700's and all manuscripts. I wonder if
anyone with cataloging experience could give a look at this record at
:http://ursus2.ursus.maine.edu/search/t?SEARCH=brunswick=1771

and give any advice.

I would be so grateful for help.  There are 77 maps and I'd like to do them
correctly.

Sincerely, Fran Pollitt
[log in to unmask]
--- End Forwarded Message ---
--- End Forwarded Message ---