MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
Date:
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:46:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Interesting item on Carolina Boundary Survey
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:26:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Linda R Zellmer <[log in to unmask]>
To: Air Photo Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]>


Hello,

There is a North Carolina Executive Order at:
http://www.governor.nc.gov/newsItems/ExecutiveOrderDetail.aspx?newsItemID=1607
that declares that the survey done by the North Carolina-South Carolina
Joint Boundary Commission, dated 12/20/2005 will reflect the true
boundary between the states. There is also a web site for the
Commission.
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/boardnotices/Board.aspx?PitemId=8064789&Ename=North%20Carolina-South%20Carolina%20Joint%20Boundary%20Commission

The problem with the older survey is that it was based on metes and
bounds -- using features such as marked trees and prominent rocks,
features that do not last forever. The new survey appears to be
official. This is not an April Fools joke (although I am sure some of
the people would prefer that is is a joke). Linda Zellmer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee"
<[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 8:05:00 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting item on Carolina Boundary Survey

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Interesting item on Carolina Boundary Survey
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 05:34:16 -0700
From: Calvin River <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]>


I'm sorry for not noticing that a week earlier.  Was that story some
sort of early April Fools' Day joke??  It was my understanding that MOST
of the old state boundaries were surveyed a bit off and it had been
decided long ago to leave them just where they are, no matter how
inaccurately they were run.  No?  I find it hard to believe that state
lines may be moving all across the US.

Peter Youngman

--- [log in to unmask] wrote:

From: "Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library,
UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:      Interesting item on Carolina Boundary Survey
Date:         Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:06:34 -0500

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Interesting item on Carolina Boundary Survey
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:29:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Linda R Zellmer <[log in to unmask]>
To: Map&AirPhotoDiscussionList <[log in to unmask]>

Hello,

There is an interesting item on a new (more official) survey of the
boundary between North & South Carolina at:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46832892/ns/us_news-life/#.T2x459nld8E this
morning. Apparently, there is a new survey being done of the boundary
between the two states. It is interesting how a line can impact lives.
93 property owners will be impacted. Linda Zellmer

--
Linda Zellmer
Government Information & Data Services Librarian
415 Malpass Library
Macomb, IL 61455
[log in to unmask]
Phone: 309-298-2723
Fax: 309-298-2791

_____________________________________________________________
Adpost.com Classifieds
- sign up for free e-mail
- browse or post ads for free
Click below now!
http://www.adpost.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2