MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fred Gunther <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Nov 1994 14:10:13 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
It is my understanding that there are or have been several earth-viewing
*brothers* of Hubble, built by the same manufacturer, but for a
different customer.  Aparently several of Hubble's non-optical problems
are well known but can't be talked about.
 
As far as anti-optics -- I think that the major optics could be the same,
but that the minor optics and sensors would have to be different.  Of
course, there are major problems in pointing to a new target twice in
each orbit; if you think that a shutter mirror causes vibrations and
needs to be locked up to take a **really good** picture, just think about
the vibrations caused by slewing to a new orientation, whether it is
done by jets or reaction wheels.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2