MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
Date:
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:04:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (234 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Cartographica -Indigenous Cartographies and Counter-Mapping -
now available online
Date:   Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:57:21 -0400
From:   UTP Journals <[log in to unmask]>




*Cartographica*: The International Journal for Geographic Information
and Geovisualization**

**

Volume 47, Number 2, Summer 2012

*Indigenous Cartographies and Counter-Mapping *

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/xt2118565762/

**

*This issue contains: *

**

*Introduction: Indigenous Cartographies and Counter-Mapping*

Renee Pualani Louis, Jay T. Johnson, Albertus Hadi Pramono

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/57402105u7715539/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=0

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/57402105u7715539/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=0>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.77

**

*Theorizing Indigital Geographic Information Networks*

*Mark Palmer *

In this article, I argue that in North America, 500 years of
cartographic encounters and translations have transformed Indigenous
map-making and geospatial technology processes into an amalgam of
knowledge systems, science, and technology. To do this I first review
the processes of map-making that have been shaped by continual
cartographic encounters, exchanges, and translations between American
Indians and Euro-Americans. Dichotomies between Indigenous–traditional
and Western–scientific are prevalent within the literature, but the
boundaries between geographic knowledge systems have always been fuzzy
and crossable. This review includes some processes strongly shaped by
Indigenous communities, such as ethnocartography and counter-mapping in
Alaska and Canada, and GIS processes controlled more by government
institutions in the lower 48 US states. Second, I introduce the tenets
of a new model – indigital geographic information networks (iGIN) – to
describe the heterogeneous processes of encounters, exchanges, and
translations merging Indigenous, scientific, and digital technologies
into inclusive forms of technoscience. Third, I demonstrate iGIN
processes through exploratory research at the university level, using
Kiowa-language narratives and network GIS to create a new “third”
construct. Finally, following brief concluding remarks, I propose future
research directions.

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w469188533773574/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=1

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w469188533773574/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=1>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.80

**

*Mapping Indigenous Perspectives in the Making of the Cybercartographic
Atlas of the Lake Huron Treaty Relationship Process: A Performative
Approach in a Reconciliation Context*

Stephanie Pyne, D.R. Fraser Taylor

This article discusses a two-pronged approach to designing and
developing an online, interactive multimedia – cybercartographic – atlas
that combines critical academic perspectives with Anishinaabe approaches
to understanding in order to “tell the story” of the Robinson Huron
Treaty process in a way intended to enhance awareness of Anishinaabe
perspectives and expose the epistemological and ontological roots of
colonialism. Building on the work that created the Treaties Module of
the Living Cybercartographic Atlas of Indigenous Perspectives and
Knowledge, this atlas project continues to reflect the comprehensiveness
and multidimensionality of Robinson Huron Treaty–based relationship
processes. The article focuses on some of the performative aspects of
this atlas project, such as iterative processes and spatializing
history, that contribute to its success in reflecting Anishinaabe
perspectives and providing the basis for a richer understanding of the
treaty process.

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w6g3677pj78rq768/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=2

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w6g3677pj78rq768/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=2>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.92

**

*Mapping Dreams/Dreaming Maps: Bridging Indigenous and Western
Geographical Knowledge*

Irène Hirt

Dreams and dreaming practices are integrated into knowledge-building
processes in many indigenous societies, and may therefore represent a
source of geographical and cartographic information. This article
addresses the incorporation of these practices into collaborative and
cross-cultural research methods, especially in the framework of
participatory mapping projects conducted with Indigenous communities or
organizations. The author argues that dreams and dreaming practices
enable the consideration of Indigenous territorial dimensions – such as
the sacred and the spiritual, as well as the presence of non-human
actors – that are more difficult to grasp through the social sciences or
through modern Western mapping methodologies. In addition, this approach
invites geographers and cartographers to adopt a culturally decentred
concept of the notions of territory, mapping, and participation that
goes beyond the positivist premises of Western science and its research
methodologies. This text draws from a Mapuche counter-mapping and
participatory mapping experience that took place in southern Chile
between 2004 and 2006, in which the author took part as a cartographer.

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/m68876522r03ul2l/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=3

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/m68876522r03ul2l/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=3>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.105

**

*Deconstructing the Conservancy Map: Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the
Kalahari*

Saskia Vermeylen, Gemma Davies, Dan van der Horst

To stand a chance of reclaiming their pre-colonial rights, indigenous
peoples often have to deploy the tools and logic of the colonial state.
Through a case study of community conservancy in Namibia, we demonstrate
that the same holds for the practice of participatory mapping. We engage
with J.B. Harley's deconstruction of maps and use our ethnographic data
to reveal the silences and lies inherent in the rigid cartographic
representations of conservancy maps. The indigenous peoples in our case
study are the San, who have been marginalized and displaced from their
land. We highlight how these people, once perceived by the colonialists
as “rootless,” do have strong relational connections across the
landscape. We argue that the practice of counter-mapping, along with its
critique, is incomplete without full attention to the silences of the
map and the relational rhizomes (across boundaries) of the peoples involved.

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w20871572mgk7575/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=4

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/w20871572mgk7575/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=4>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.121

**

*Reviews of Books & Atlases*

http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/v73243n2576u2651/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=5

<http://utpjournals.metapress.com/content/v73243n2576u2651/?p=9c926988f5ed4253a52ef2ac0781e641&pi=5>

DOI: 10.3138/carto.47.2.135

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*/Cartographica/***

/Cartographica /delivers cutting-edge international research in all
aspects of cartography (including the production, design, use, cognitive
understanding, and history of maps), geovisualization, and GIScience.
/Cartographica/ offers unprecidented diversity and breadth of research
and has featured the work of influential authors such as J.B. Harley,
Mark Monmonier, Mark Kumler, Denis Wood, Muki Haklay, and David Mark.
In addition to publishing peer-reviewed articles, the journal also
publishes both special issues and single-topic monographs on a regular
basis.//

//

/Cartographica Online includes the complete archive of current and
previously published articles going back to 1964 (issue 1.1), when
Cartographica was known as The Cartographer. More than a thousand
articles, reviews, and commentaries await you at this comprehensive
resource. /

**

*Subscribers to /Cartographica Online/ enjoy:*

*Enhanced features not available in the print version*- supplementary
information, colour photos, videos, audio files, etc. encouraging
further exploration and research.

*Early access to the latest issues*- Did you know that most online
issues are available to subscribers up to two weeks in advance of the
print version? Sign up for e-mail alerts and you will know as soon as
the latest issue is ready for you to read.

*/Cartographica/**anytime, anywhere, on any device! *- experience
everything /Cartographica Online/ has to offer from your desktop and
mobile devices.**/Cartographica/ also has a new mobile ready edition
which allows you to read /Cartographica/ on your desktop and on many
popular mobile devices including iPhone, iPad, Blackberry Playbook,
Torch and Android.

*Everything you need at your fingertips*- search through current and
archived issues from the comfort of your office chair not by digging
through book shelves or storage boxes. The easy to use search function
allows you to organize results by article summaries, abstracts or
citations and bookmark, export, or print a specific page, chapter or
article.

**

*For more information about /Cartographica/ or /Cartographica/ /Online/
or for submissions information, please contact*

University of Toronto Press — Journals Division
5201 Dufferin St., Toronto, ON,
Canada M3H 5T8
tel: (416) 667-7810 fax: (416) 667-7881
email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

www.utpjournals.com/carto<http://www.utpjournals.com/carto>

*www.facebook.com/utpjournals *

Posted by T Hawkins, UTP Journals

ATOM RSS1 RSS2