MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johnnie Sutherland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 11:39:04 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 18:12:22 -0400
From: Yaoves Ferland <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Doubly-landlocked countries" (fwd)
 
----
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
 
>From: Ken Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
 
You are right, in limology (geographic sub-discipline interested in borders,
limits and frontiers) the term "doubly-landlocked" means a political piece
of land (countries, but also partners in federations, as states, provinces,
cantons or autonomous republics, and so on) in the world that the citizens
from those and their merchandises have to traverse two other countries (or
states...) to reach the free sea (so Caspian does not count), even by rivers
or by the air (ex: Utah, Szechuan, Rondonia, Lucern or Bayern). The only
utility I have found for this term is for quizz, but the concept reveal a
very complicated level of economic dependance of such a doubly-landlocked
place with respect to its neighbours.
The second doubly-landlocked country is a european principalty in a valley.
 
Yaïves Ferland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2