MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:43:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: mapping of the electorate]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 23:13:22 GMT
From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>



-------------------

Oh, please, you do not want to see county-level cartograms.  No one
would ever recognize them.  You'd get a big blob of something -- but
almost no one would be able to identify it as a map of the USA.  You
might be able to pick out the boroughs of New York City, as well as Cook
County, IL and a gigantic Los Angeles County, CA on the Pacific, but
that's about it.  I think even state-level cartograms are hideous, but I
can usually figure out which polygon is which state, so I tolerate them.

This is not to say that population density/voter turnout is unimportant
-- I think I would use hue to indicate party preference, and maybe
saturation to indicate say, turnout or tabulation.

Joe McCollum
Knoxville, TN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2