-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Reproduction vs. facsimile cataloging and then
acquisitions question]]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:17:38 -0400
From: Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Margarita:
My short answer is its a reproduction. Its certainly not a photocopy
(since this isn't what one is doing in this instance), but it is a type
photomechanical reproduction by using a printer/plotter to do this with.
In many ways it follows as a facsimile, see the definition in the
Glossary in Cartographic Materials: A Manual of Interpretation for
AACR2, 2002 Revision, although the "simulating the physical appearance
of the original" leaves this open-ended. I'd catalog this type of
material following the guidelines in the LC Map Cataloging Manual for
facsimiles and reproductions in I believe it is Chapter 8?...
Sincerely,
Paige Andrew
At 03:30 PM 6/23/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Reproduction vs. facsimile cataloging and then
> acquisitions question]
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:38:15 -0700
> From: Margarita Yonezawa <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>
> I have an additional aspect to add to this question.....
>
> The USGS Open-file reports that are printed from the website...
> reproduction, facsimile, photocopy, photo. repro.???
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Margarita Yonezawa
> Map Collection Assistant
> University of California - Science Library
> P.O. Box 5900 - Riverside, CA 92517-5900
> Phone/Fax: (909) 787-6423
> [log in to unmask]
> http://library.ucr.edu/?view=collections/maps
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> At 02:53 PM 6/23/04 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Reproduction vs. facsimile cataloging and then
>> acquisitions
>> question
>> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:41:55 -0500
>> From: Angie Cope <[log in to unmask]>
>> Organization: American Geographical Society Library
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Here we go again.
>>
>> When one takes a map, scans it and then plots (prints) the map - how
>> does one catalog that final product? In my situation, we don't own the
>> original or the digital copy, but received the maps as print outs (full
>> size, etc.). So, should this kind of map be catalogued as the map
>> itself, as a facsimile, or as a reproduction?
>>
>> Another question, what are your thoughts on acquiring maps of this
>> nature? For instance, an individual or company obtains copyright or
>> takes non copyright material, scans it and then sells the digital image
>> or the printed map. I guess my question is, are any of you actively
>> collecting maps of this nature? What I'm referring to is different than
>> say, Historic Urban Plans where they assume copyright for the item. What
>> I'm asking about are really just print outs of an existing map.
>>
>> I hope that makes sense. Thanks for your thoughts.
>>
>> --
>> **************************************************
>>
>> Angie Cope, Associate Academic Librarian
>> American Geographical Society Library
>> UW Milwaukee Libraries
>> 2311 E. Hartford
>> Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211
>>
>> http://www.uwm.edu/Libraries/AGSL/index.html
>> [log in to unmask]
>> (414) 229-6282
>> (800) 558-8993 (toll free)
>> (414) 229-3624 (fax)
>>
>> **************************************************
|
