MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Maps-L Moderator <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:18:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Terminology question - "composite,atlas" or "atlas factice".
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:39:06 -0000 (UTC)
From:   [log in to unmask]
To:     [log in to unmask]
References:     <[log in to unmask]>




I would be a bit surprised if you could get specific consensus on this.
There have been a couple of discussions on MapHist about this, one of
which is mentioned here:
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/pipermail/maphist/2008-March/011579.html .

           Joel Kovarsky

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Terminology question
> Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:51:05 -0700
> From:   [log in to unmask]
> To:     MAPS-L <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> Hi there,
> Can anyone tell me which term is more commonly or appropriately used in
> describing an atlas made up
> of a selection of individually issued or collected maps: "composite
> atlas" or "atlas factice".
>
> Thanks,
> Silvana
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2