MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johnnie Sutherland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:49:57 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (19 lines)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12:28:47 MST7MDT
From: Ken Rockwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Doubly-landlocked countries" (fwd)
 
People are all guessing correctly, that Liechtenstein was the other.
One response suggests two more:
>
> By the definition suggested below, I come up with three other 'doubly
> landlocked' countries:  two neighbors of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and
> Kirghizstan, and in Europe, Liechtenstein.
>
Problem: the Tajik and Kirghiz republics do share a border with
China.  Still, it's a long way to the sea!
 
--Ken Rockwell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2