MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:17:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (268 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: trim or fold?
Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:57:33 -0400
From:   Matt Knutzen <[log in to unmask]>
To:     Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
<[log in to unmask]>



I'm in the folding camp, if only for the fact that we've been folding
for many decades already. One advantage is they can fit in 1/2 size
folders, which end up double deep, but can fit in a drawer side by
side... but if you can avoid the crease. We all know what happens to
folds over time.

Matt




On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Angie Cope, American Geographical
Society Library, UW Milwaukee <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

     -------- Original Message --------
     Subject: Re: trim or fold?
     Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
     From: Julie Sweetkind-Singer <[log in to unmask]
     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
     To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
     <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
     CC: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
     <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>


     I'm with the trimmers.

     Julie




     On Apr 12, 2013, at 12:30 PM, "Angie Cope, American Geographical
Society

     Library,              UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]
     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

         -------- Original Message --------
         Subject:        Re: trim or fold?
         Date:   Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:05:08 -0400
         From:   Fry, Michael <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
         To:     Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
         <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>



         I agree with Angie. As long as you leave a little buffer to
         absorb the
         wrinkles and tears that inevitably come with shelving and handling,
         cutting off extra paper is the way to go.

         mf

         --
         Michael Fry
         Senior Map Librarian
         National Geographic Society
         1145 17th St. N.W.
         Washington, D.C. 20036
         202.857.7098 <tel:202.857.7098>
         [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

         On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Angie Cope, American Geographical
         Society Library, UW Milwaukee <[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> wrote:

             -------- Original Message --------
             Subject: RE: trim or fold?
             Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:48:29 -0500
             From: Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW
         Milwaukee
             <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
             Organization: American Geographical Society Library
             To: Maps-L <[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>

             If the edges got really, really damaged would you pay to have a
             preservationist repair them or would you trim them off?

             If you're only looking at holding onto the maps for 10-15
         more years
             then you're keeping them as sources of information not
         historic relics.
             I'd say trimming would buy you the most space and do the least
         damage to
             the information.

             I vote trim.

             Let this be a caution to catalogers - sheet size isn't
         everything. ;-)

             Angie




             -------- Original Message --------
             Subject: RE: trim or fold?
             Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:42:00 +0100
             From: Francis Herbet <[log in to unmask]
             <mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
             To: 'Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship'
             <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>


             Jon Jablonski:

             Two obvious possibilities:-

             'PRO-TRIM': If they are all indubitably identical, trim off
             marginalia of
             all sheets save for one as a 'reference' copy: this permits
         your "2
             side-by-side stacks in the drawer" option.

             'ANTI-TRIM': If, after "at least another 10 - 15 years", you
         wish to
             (legally) 'free' them for donation or sale, and every sheet
         but one
             lacks
             its marginalia, takers may be few and far between (even
         worse if the
             thinking will be to break up the seats to individual 'homes' or
             purchasers)
             - unless copies of the unique surviving marginalia come
with the
         trimmed
             sheets. Of course, the internet might supply this
         trimmed-off info
         . . .

             Francis Herbert (former Curator [and trimmer (but I didn't
         start the
             trend
             at RGS!)] of multi-sheet map/chart series, Royal Geographical
             Society-IBG)


             -----Original Message-----
             From: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
             [mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>____EDU
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>]
             On Behalf Of Angie Cope, American
             Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
             Sent: 12 April 2013 19:14
             To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
         <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
             Subject: trim or fold?

             -------- Original Message --------
             Subject: trim or fold?
             Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:44:07 -0700
             From: Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
             <mailto:[log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>
             Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
         <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
             To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
             <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
         <mailto:[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>


             Hello and happy Friday.

             As you may know, we here at UC-Surf Board's Map & Imagery
         Lab are
             about to
             move 95% of what we currently have in the main library to
         offsite
             storage.
             I am attempting to re-house as much of the sheetmap
         collection prior
             to the
             move as is humanly possible.


             As part of this process, weeding is absolutely necessary.
           Almost
             80% of our
             drawers have been classified as 'full' or 'stuffed.'  While my
             re-housing
             and de-duping efforts are gaining some space, I am finding
         more and
         more
             unique materials that I want to make an effort to hold onto
         for at
         least
             another 10 - 15 years.

             Here's my question:  I have found pockets of the collection
         that are
             large
             sets sitting in one stack in the drawer.  You know the sets:
             national topo series that are 95% one size, and then 5% just
         wide
             enough to
             prevent you from making 2 side-by-side stacks in the drawer
(I'm
             looking at
             you Instituto Geografico Nacional de Argentina).  I have
noticed
             that almost
             without exception the borders on the sheets are so large that
             cutting them
             off would not cause any loss of information.

             So:
                      Do I fold these sheets in half or shave part of the
         borders
             off?

             --
             Jon Jablonski
             Map & Imagery Laboratory
             Davidson Library
             UC Santa Barbara
         805-893-4049 <tel:805-893-4049> <tel:805-893-4049
         <tel:805-893-4049>> library.ucsb.edu/mil
         <http://library.ucsb.edu/mil>
             <http://library.ucsb.edu/mil>




         <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>




--
> Matthew A. Knutzen
> Geospatial Librarian
> The Lionel Pincus & Princess Firyal Map Division
> Stephen A. Schwarzman Building
> The New York Public Library
> 5th Avenue & 42nd Street, Room 117
> New York, NY 10018-2788
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>, 212-930-0562, fax
> 212-930-0027
>
> http://www.nypl.org/locations/schwarzman/map-division
> http://www.maps.nypl.org <http://www.maps.nypl.org/>
> http://twitter.com/@nyplmaps

ATOM RSS1 RSS2