MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:09:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Soil Survey Cataloging]
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:41:33 -0800
From: Mary Lynette Larsgaard <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
References: <[log in to unmask]>

------------------
hi, David:-)

the map cataloger here just completed
about 30 california soil surveys
around 6 months ago. what we did
was go with existing copy cataloging
on oclc - and since we had the texts
for all of them, we searched under
text title and found them that way.
the cataloger then made 740s for
each of the maps that had a title
different from title of text.

happy holidays:-)

mary
Quoting "Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]>:

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Soil Survey Cataloging
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 07:50:15 -0800
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> ------------------
>       Here is a question for people who know a lot more about
> cataloging
> than I do.   What is considered best practice for cataloging soil
> maps
> and
> soil surveys?  Because of a preservation project I have a bunch of
> old
> soil
> maps that have been detached from their accompanying soil survey
> booklets.
> The titles of the maps and of the accompanying surveys are
> frequently
> slightly different, and the dates of publication are often not the
> same.
> Different libraries seem to have handled the cataloging of these in
> several
> ways.  When the items are detached should there be separate records
> for
> the
> maps and the surveys?  If the two are combined into a single record
> which
> should be the "main entry" (if such a concept is still considered
> valid)?
> Can anyone point to examples of supremely skillful cataloging of
> soil
> maps
> and their accompanying (but no longer attached) soil surveys?  Thanks
> in
> advance all you map catalogers.
>
> David Allen
> Map Librarian
> Stony Brook University
> [log in to unmask]
>



Mary Lynette Larsgaard
Assistant Head, Map and Imagery Laboratory
Fund Manager: Geography; Military Science
Co-Manager for Map and Imagery Laboratory Fund
Davidson Library
University of California
Santa Barbara CA 93106
805/893-4049
fax 805/893-8799
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2