MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Stark <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:16:59 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
If we base our research fees on cost, the question becomes what is cost?
In order to figure "cost" do you figure the initial cost or replacement
value of the collection -- the staff time it took to index and arrange the
collection of photos -- on-going maintenance costs -- the cost of the
cabinetry and the floor space that is used to house the photo collection?
Where do you stop?  We stop at the value we place on our staff time.
 
Nothing ever is decided willy nilly at a university, especially those issues
having to do with the fee structure.  Doubling fees is only a proposal at
this point.  Going onto the net and asking what other comparable
institutions charge is the first step.  This is not an arbitrary action.
What I have learned so far is that $50.00 per hour is not unreasonable.
We are not looking to make a profit and what research fee money is allocated
to the map library is used to purchase more photography--not some unrelated
purpose.
 
Perhaps someone could help me understand why a national environmental
information supplier would charge $95.00 for 5 xerox copies of older U.S.
Geological Survey topographic maps when the same copies can be made in
our map library for 25 cents.  Where did the private environmental
information supplier come up with the $95.00 figure?  I'll bet the figure
was based on true costs.
 
Thanks for the replies that I have received from maps-l subscribers both
on and off the net.
 
Peter Stark
 
On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, L. A. Nadybal wrote:
 
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> Why can't you base your fees on costs plus a reasonable profit instead of
> willy nilly doubling just to raise money for unrelated purposes?  Want to
> pay 64-cents to mail a letter tomorrow, just because the Germans, French and
> English do it?  That's the parallel.
>
> With a price spiral like that, fairly soon we'll have the dollar buying
> about what an Italian lira gets now.
>
> LNadybal
> Washington DC
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2