MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:44:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE:      Re: Upside down maps
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:33:53 -0500
From: Alexander, Claire L. <[log in to unmask]>

------------------
What about "maps that challenge the dominant worldview"--a little long
and in need of being made pithy, but it doesn't assume that 'right side
up' is correct (as upside down does) and conveys that the cartographer
intended to challenge our thinking.
claire

*****************
Claire Alexander
Library Assistant, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Library
Purdue University Libraries EAS
504 West State Street
West Lafayette IN 47907-2058
Phone: 765-494-3264
e-mail: [log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----
From: Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Johnnie D. Sutherland
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Upside down maps


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Upside down maps]]]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:38:23 -0600
From:   Angie Cope <[log in to unmask]>
Organization:   American Geographical Society Library





I completely agree that there is no "right side up" to the Earth. The
whole idea behind putting the words "upside-down" or "turn around" in
the title of a map is to invite the viewer to consider the map's
alternate perspective. That is what I'd like to get at by standardizing
language via a subject heading or note. It seems the consensus is to
include the note "Map oriented with north to the bottom."

But, you see don't you, that by relying on this version we're continuing
to feed into the north-centric, this-way-up mind set. Why don't we say
"this is a south-oriented map" or "east-oriented map" or whatever.  But,
we have to be careful how many different terms we use because if one
cataloger says, "Map oriented with south to the top" and another
cataloger says, "Map oriented with north to the bottom," how the heck
will our reference librarians find the item in the catalog. (I realize
that many map catalogers are also the map reference librarians, but
still).

Honestly, I'm not trying to start a riot, but I believe that because
some of these maps are produced to be unique in this way, we should give
them credit for such.  I understand and appreciate the concept behind
why other maps are oriented according to the maps purpose (toward a
peak, or direction of travel), but I think the orientation of an
upside-down map is a primary focus of the item. No?

I happen to like subject headings because once they're set, they're set
(mostly) - but I'm still open to using some kind of note.  I'm just
wondering if there is a good set of words to describe this "invitation
to consider an unique and alternative perspective of the Earth."

Angie

P.S. Thanks all for your input.

Johnnie D. Sutherland wrote:

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Upside down maps]]
> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:17:28 EST
> From: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> ------------------
> I thought Paige Andrew's suggestion noting 'orientation' was a logical

> descriptor for maps that are not North-up. Many historical maps are
> 'direction of travel' oriented, with or without a compass rose to
> clarify.
>
> I'd like to see more cartographers design modern maps that allow the
> reader to understand a region in a different light by drawing maps in
> non-north-up
> direction. I've done a few book maps that way of Hudson Bay and the
> Chesapeake
> Bay. Invariably they come under attack by editors because they are
> different,
> but if it illustrates a concept well, I feel it is justified.
>
> I have  done a few modern maps in a non-north-up design, usually to
> orient with a geographical feature like a peak, valley or river.
>
> I agree the 'upside-down' term implies a mistake, or oddity, when
> really we are a bit trapped by a convention that should be challenged
> when possible.
>
> Mike Hermann
> www.purplelizard.com


--
**************************************************

Angie Cope, Cartographic Materials Catalog Librarian
American Geographical Society Library
UW Milwaukee Libraries
2311 E. Hartford
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211

http://www.uwm.edu/Libraries/AGSL/index.html
[log in to unmask]
(414) 229-6282
(800) 558-8993 (toll free)
(414) 229-3624 (fax)

**************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2