MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Maps-L Moderator <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:10:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        RE: Map cataloging questions from beginning catalogers
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:08:17 -0400
From:   Grabach, Kenneth A. Mr. <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
References:     <[log in to unmask]>



That scale, which is again a brief version (remove the last three zeroes), goes in place of the date as you would use for a single sheet map, or single map in XX sheets.
She showed it to you like this:
G5701
 .C2
s1500
 .U5

Only difference I would make is that the subject cutter for a geologic map is .C5.  In map call numbers, date or series scale designation is always part of the subject (before $b in 050 or 090), while the author cutter, or title cutter, is in $b.

Ken Grabach                           <[log in to unmask]>
Maps Librarian                          Phone: 513-529-1726
Miami University Libraries
Oxford, Ohio  45056  USA


-----Original Message-----
From: Maps, Air Photo & GIS Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Maps-L Moderator
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Map cataloging questions from beginning catalogers

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Map cataloging questions from beginning catalogers
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:51:23 -0400
From:   Ava Iuliano <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask]
References:     <[log in to unmask]>



Thank you!  Does the scale go before or after the author cutter number?

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Maps-L Moderator <[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject:        Re: [MAPS-L] Map cataloging questions from beginning
    catalogers
    Date:   Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:47:12 -0500
    From:   Susan Moore <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
    To:     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
    References:     <[log in to unmask]
    <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>




    Maps-L Moderator wrote:

        -------- Original Message --------
        Subject:        Map cataloging questions from beginning catalogers
        Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:35:29 -0400
        From:   Ava Iuliano <[log in to unmask]
        <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
        To:     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>



        Hello everyone,

         I am a rookie cataloger that is currently working on cataloging
        maps.  I
        am working with another beginning cataloger and we've run across
        an item
        that is causing us both some confusion.  The map is a large
        UNESCO map
        produced in a couple of different editions, even though the
        individual
        sheets form one single map (50 sheets making up one single HUGE
        map).  The
        English title is 'International Geological Map of Europe and the
        Mediterranean Regions 1:1500000" with parallel titles in French
        and German.
        The date range is from 1964-2000.  In creating a record for this
        item (our
        OCLC searches have produced only bare-bones records in German
        that often
        only describe a single sheet or Australian records for only a
        partial
        holding), how do we delineate that it is a single item in multiple
        editions?
        How would you create the record for this particular item?


    Welcome to the world of map cataloging!

    It isn't unusual for items like this to have sheets with different
    edition statements. What I usually do is add a 500 note "Sheets in
    various editions" to explain the situation.

    Since you do have several different editions, I'd be incline to catalog
    this as a map series, rather than a single map. OCLC's Bibliographic
    Format and Standards defines a map series as "a number of related but
    physically separate and bibliographically distinct cartographic units
    intended by the producers or issuing bodies to form a single group."
    Since the sheets can be cataloged separately, I think what you have
    matches the definition. If you do decide to catalog this as a map
    series, the CrTp in the fixed field needs to be a "b". Other than that
    and putting the scale in as part of the call number, you would catalog
    it much as you would a single map.

    Feel free to contact me if you have further questions.

    Susan Moore
    Rod Library
    University of Northern Iowa
    Cedar Falls, IA  50613
    [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2