MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, AGSL" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum
Date:
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:47:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
================================================
MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
================================================

Subject: Cataloging a print reproduction of an electronic map
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005
From: Matthew Parsons <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>

Hello all,

I have a cataloging question needing some general consensus:

I am cataloging a print reproduction of an electronic map.  LCRI 1.11 says
to
describe the original in your record, and then give a reproduction note in
533.  Thus the record has an 007 and 006 for the computer
file, the GMD [electronic resource] after the title, system
requirement/mode of access note(s), source of title note, etc.  And then a
533 reproduction note for the computer printout.  Indeed, this is what
the UW monographic cataloger's do for printouts of textual material from
the
Web. But a quick review
of the Map Cataloging Manual (chapter 8: facsimiles/photocopies/reprints)
seems to indicate that they
don't follow the above policy and instead do something different.  I just
wonder if I can extrapolate their
photocopy policy to a printout from an electronic map.  Any opinions??

Please reply directly to me ([log in to unmask]) and I will
summarize
for the list.

Thanks!

Matthew Parsons, Map Librarian
Map Collection & Cartographic Information Services
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900, Seattle, WA 98195
[log in to unmask]
206-543-9392


--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2