-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Fwd: California Assemblyman wants to censor Satellite Imagery
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:43:51 -0500
From:   s hawkins <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
References:     <[log in to unmask]>



Can imagine how much time this would take - therefore, how much longer
imagery would take to obtain??

---sue h

~~~~~~~~~
http://www.flickr.com/photos/suehawkins/


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Maps-L Moderator for Linda Zellmer* <[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Subject: California Assemblyman wants to censor Satellite Imagery
To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        California Assemblyman wants to censor Satellite Imagery
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:46:16 -0600 (CST)
From:   Linda R Zellmer <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
To:     Map&AirPhotoDiscussionList <[log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>



Hello,

This was in the Map Room when I checked this morning. Note that this
would be at the state level, not the Federal. Linda Zellmer

Republican California Assemblyman Joel Anderson has introduced a bill to
censor online satellite imagery of public buildings. “His bill would
restrict the images such Web sites could post online. Clear, detailed
images of schools, hospitals, churches and all government buildings —
what he calls soft terrorism targets — would not be allowed. … His bill
would make it illegal in California to post close-up images of such
buildings. Instead, the images would have to be blurred.” Note to
terrorists: Everything blurred is worth bombing. And, since
transportation infrastructure is also clearly a soft terrorist target,
all imagery of roads should be blurred too.

--
Linda Zellmer
Government Information & Data Services Librarian
415 Malpass Library
Macomb, IL 61455
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Phone: 309-298-2723
Fax: 309-298-2791