MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jul 1993 16:55:26 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Greg,
 
 
Our plan is similar to yours, with a couple cruseifications: shelve
          census maps in Docs stacks. Shelve Thomas Bros.'
          county street atlases, census editions, in Docs Ref. We're
          buying all the CA metro counties. THEN, we're trying to get
          the census tract maps done by each county's planning dept.
          These we laminate, including a tattle tape. These can be
          folded as necessary (shelve next to Thomas Bros.?). We have
          the San Diego version posted on a piller in the middle of
          Docs Ref. This is the one students photocopy from because
          local planners have superimposed neighborhood and regional
          economic area boundaries on appropriate tract groupings.
          Also, "SANDAG" has reconfigured the data to match their map
          nesting arrangement. I assume that SCAG has done something
          similar for the remaining SoCal counties. AND, I'll bet
          there's equivalent SMSA mapping done for the rest of the
          U.S. Would make a great list if everybod pitched in and sent
          info on their county planning dept. equivalent census tract
          map to you and you compiled a list, including cost, if any.
          Let me know if you're willing.
 
          By these means, I'm hoping that our GPO  tract maps will
          hardly ever be used, won't need preservation treatment and
          won't be stolen.
          [log in to unmask]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At CSU-Long Beach, we have our 1990 Census of Population and Housing Tract and
Block maps in open government document stacks, arranged by sudoc.  They are
folded in their original white and green envelopes.  I am looking for ways to
make at least the Los Angeles and Long Beach maps more durable.  I am
considering "Chartexing" them, folding them accordion-style to 1/3 their
original size, and binding every 5 sheets with three or four key-ring holders
at the edge.  By using this method, the maps would still be flexible and
maneuverable for photocopying.
 
Does anyone have any other ideas?  I do not have the option of enclosing them
behind a service point or into the map collection.  Any other conservation
methods employed out there?
 
Thanks.
 
Greg Armento
California State University, Long Beach
 
--- Saved internet headers (useful for debugging)
>Received: from sds.sdsc.edu by ucsd.edu; id AA20165 sendmail 5.67/UCSD-2.2-sun
>Received: from VM.USC.EDU by Sdsc.BITnet with BSMTP via BITNET ; Thu, 15 Jul 93
 
>Received: From USCVM(MAILER) by SDSC with Jnet id 3521 for MAILER@SDSC; Thu, 15
 
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from VM.USC.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@USCVM) by VM.USC.EDU (LMail V1.1
 
>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 13:51:07 EDT
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>Sender: [log in to unmask] (Maps and Air Photo Systems
 
>From: [log in to unmask] (Greg Armento)
>Subject: census tract maps
>To: [log in to unmask] (Multiple recipients o

ATOM RSS1 RSS2