MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
Date:
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:50:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: table G4362
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:03:23 -0700
From: Ratliff, Louise <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>


It is true.  At UCLA we use G4360 for our maps of Southern California
(General maps).   The only way to differentiate them is with the subject
headings.

--Louise

Louise Ratliff
Social Sciences and Map Catalog Librarian
UCLA Cataloging & Metadata Center

-----Original Message-----
From: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Angie Cope, American
Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: table G4362

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: table G4362
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:25:07 -0400
From:   Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
To:     Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
<[log in to unmask]>
CC:     Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
<[log in to unmask]>



If I recall Angie, this is true BUT I could be wrong. Perhaps Ed or
someone at LC G&M can confirm?

Paige

On 9/27/2011 9:17 AM, Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library,
UW Milwaukee wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: table G4362
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:30:11 -0700
> From: Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> Is it true that there is not a 'Northern California' or a 'Southern
> California' region Cutter in table G4362? How can this be?
>
> Or am I missing something obvious?
>
> I realize local subdivisions typically get done locally, but I don't
> think it's just map libraries in California that have a lot of northern
> and southern California maps.
>
> --
> Jon Jablonski
> Map & Imagery Laboratory
> Davidson Library
> UC Surf Board

ATOM RSS1 RSS2