MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:21:57 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: USGS 1:250K vs. V501/V502
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:58:42 -0400
From: Michael Fry <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: UMD Libraries
To: Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>

------------------
Could anybody (point me to a source that would) explain the relationship
between the USGS series of
1:250K metric topos and the AMS V501/V502 series [aka "Eastern United
States (1:250,000)" and
"Western United States (1:250,000)"]?

Both Marcive and Worldcat seem to indicate that *both* series are
classed in SuDoc as I19.98. My
problem is that our AMS sheets are shelved by sheet # (e.g., NH 17-5),
whereas our USGS sheets--some
of which come folded--have only quadrangle names (e.g., Pueblo, CO),
which means they apparently
can't be interfiled with the AMS sheets.

Can anybody shed light on this?

Thank you.
mf
--
Michael Fry
Government Documents & Maps Librarian
University of Maryland Libraries

ATOM RSS1 RSS2