-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: MAPS-L: Aerial vs. bird's eye vs. panoramic
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:34:05 -0400
From: Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>




I'm assuming that this question comes from a cataloging situation, so don't anybody get too upset if I keep my reply pretty simple please! In addition, if you have a copy of Cartographic Materials: A Manual of Interpretation for AACR2, 2002 revision there are glossary entries for these terms that are very helpful.

From a map cataloger's viewpoint an aerial view most usually is a aerial photograph taken above the ground looking straight down or relatively so. A bird's-eye view most usually is in the context of a historical (late 19th/early 20th century) image of a city taken as if one were on a hillside or top of a high building looking out over the city with scale of buildings and such accurate in the foreground but becoming less accurate as one moves to the horizon. This also makes it a panoramic view, but panoramas generally of much larger areas/regions than a single town or city. Thus, a phrase like "bird's-eye panoramic view" is not only a new one on me but it would be slightly redundant and if including such information in a note we would use either "Bird's-eye view" or "Panoramic map."

Paige

At 03:29 PM 5/19/2006, you wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Aerial vs. bird's eye vs. panoramic
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: jwc <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]


Hi all,

I'm a little bit confused about the difference between aerial vs. bird's eye vs. panoramic view(s).  How can you distinguish between them?  Can those descriptions be combined, i.e. "bird's eye panoramic view?"  Can someone provide some input and clarification?

Thanks.