-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: : legal boundaries Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:03:08 -0600 From: Nat Case <[log in to unmask]> To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]> Legal municipal boundaries are a state matter; the secretary of state for a state often has the current legal definitions, and is responsible for approving and recording annexations and other changes. Since these are constantly changing, they my not be entirely up-to-date in the state GIS site(s). Some states of course have very stable boundaries (the 13 colonies =+Vermont & Maine). The Census TIGER files include sub-county administrative boundaries, but they are likely even less up-to-date than the state data. Nat Case Hedberg Maps At 1:22 PM -0600 2/6/07, Angie Cope wrote: >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: legal boundaries >Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:10:45 -0800 >From: Linda P Newman <[log in to unmask]> >To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]> > > > >Folks, do any of you know of a source [single or multiple] where I might >find `legal boundaries' of cities & towns given? > >Not spot elevations, whole legal boundaries. Seems to me that this would >be pretty complex given the wildly irregular boundaries of our cities but I > >know that if a site exists, a MAPS-L person would know! > >Thank you! > >Linda Newman > >University of Nevada Reno --