-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: table G4362 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:25:07 -0400 From: Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]> To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]> CC: Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee <[log in to unmask]> If I recall Angie, this is true BUT I could be wrong. Perhaps Ed or someone at LC G&M can confirm? Paige On 9/27/2011 9:17 AM, Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: table G4362 > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:30:11 -0700 > From: Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]> > To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship > <[log in to unmask]> > > > Is it true that there is not a 'Northern California' or a 'Southern > California' region Cutter in table G4362? How can this be? > > Or am I missing something obvious? > > I realize local subdivisions typically get done locally, but I don't > think it's just map libraries in California that have a lot of northern > and southern California maps. > > -- > Jon Jablonski > Map & Imagery Laboratory > Davidson Library > UC Surf Board