-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: 2 basic cataloging questions Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:04:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Paige G Andrew <[log in to unmask]> To: Air Photo Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]> Jon, The distinction lies in what is the primary material resource type on the CD or DVD. If its primarily data used to create cartographic images then you'd start with electronic resource template, if it contains actual map images in whole or in large part then start with the cartographic materials template. I know there is a lot of fuzziness with this, but the key thing is to ascertain the content of the CD or DVD first and then chose the bib. record type to fill out. There is a good LC G&M-produced document that might be helpful, found here: http://www.loc.gov/marc/cfmap.html hope this helps! Paige ----- Original Message ----- From: "Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 4:55:35 PM Subject: 2 basic cataloging questions -------- Original Message -------- Subject: 2 basic cataloging questions Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:50:30 -0700 From: Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: [log in to unmask] To: Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]> When one is using Connexion to catalog a CD or DVD that contains GIS data, do you start with the 'electronic resource' template or the 'cartographic materials' template? While we're at it: we are copy-cataloging some older disks. In the 300 field we are seeing 'XX maps on 1 CD-ROM' when what the disk actually contains is 'XX zipped up folders of shapefiles'. Should I care? These are some pretty old records, so it's likely catalogers at the time didn't really care to distinguish between maps and data. But today we have form-genre headings that make a clear distinction so I am wondering if I want to make that distinction in the 300 field. -- Jon Jablonski Map & Imagery Laboratory Davidson Library UC Santa Barbara