Subject: | Re: Spell out 255 Field Abbreviations? |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:53:37 -0400 (EDT) |
From: | Paige G. Andrew <[log in to unmask]> |
To: | Air Photo Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]> |
Subject: | Spell out 255 Field Abbreviations? |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:21:26 +0000 |
From: | Merry Bower <[log in to unmask]> |
To: | [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> |
K-State is considering having its database maintenance vendor perform RDA enrichment on our bibliographic records. One option is to expand abbreviations in the 255 field:
"Abbreviations to be spelled out in 255
fields include RA to Right ascension, Decl. to Declination, eq. to equinox, hr. to hour, and ca. changed to approximately and brackets
removed. No changes
will be made to 255|b statement of projection as
it is a transcribed field."
Since I catalog maps infrequently, I would like to ask my more experienced colleagues if they see any pitfalls in applying this option. Would you recommend:
Thanks,
Merry