Big OOPS on my end on using "illustrated"! Sorry about that, totally incorrect. And many thanks to Susan for bringing that up! The nice thing is that Allison has it correct in her original email Smile

Paige


From: "Susan Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:56:54 PM
Subject: Re: 300 field in RDA

One little tweak that I would give to Paige's excellent response is that in the subfield b, it's usually "illustrations", not "illustrated". At least, that's what I see in LC cataloging.

The book should be out by mid-November. Just in time for holiday gift-giving. :)

Susan Moore
University of Northern Iowa
Cedar Falls, IA  50613
[log in to unmask]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Angela R Cope <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I've been relying on examples a lot. You can do a search in OCLC and limit to RDA only records by using this search: 


dx: rda 

Paige, when is your book coming out?

Angie




From: Maps-L: Discussion Forum for Maps, Air Photo, Map Librarianship, GIS, etc. <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Paige G. Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MAPS-L] 300 field in RDA
 
Allison,

First, remember that an atlas is a cartographic resource, which means ignore what you might see in the way of describing a book (monograph) because a bound atlas might look like a book but it shouldn't necessarily be treated like one. 

In RDA, go to 3.4.2 to get started on Extent. To see specifically how the Extent for an atlas is treated see 3.4.2.5. and the examples there. And yes, it should be in the manner of "1 atlas (pagination)" or "1 atlas (X volumes)". This covers 300$a.

Moving on to other physical details, or 300$b. Here you have to do a bit more digging because different details are broken out separately in RDA. For instance, "Production Method" is at 3.9, while "Layout" is at 3.11 and for carto resources specifically see 3.11.1.3 (more important for sheet maps, but thought I would bring it to your attention). Generally speaking this area of the 300 field is similar to what is indicated for a book, though it is helpful to share number of maps included and whether or not they are all or partially "color", though only if the maps are not too numerous. Its okay to say "illustrated, maps (most color)".

Dimensions go in 300$c of course. Follow instructions at 3.5.1.4.14, paying attention to the first item under "Exceptions". (If cataloging a map see 3.5.2 for this.) 

Hope this is helpful. 

Paige


From: "Allison Rich" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:03:37 AM
Subject: 300 field in RDA

Hello all;

I would like to ask a question of all your maps cataloguers out there.

I usually do sheet maps with RDA but now I am doing an atlas.

I notice that in the books workform you will see the 300 field something like this:

146 pages : ǂb LXVIII illustrations, plans ; ǂc 21 cm (8vo)

however, I think that for an atlas it sould read something like this, maybe:

1 atlas (146 pages0 : ǂb LXVIII illustrations, plans ; ǂc 21 cm (8vo)

If someone can clue me in on the correct way to do the 300 field for an atlas in RDA, I;d be very appreciative.

Many thanks for your help,

~Allison
-- 

********************************
"Outside of a dog, 
a book is probably man's best friend,
and inside of a dog, 
it's too dark to read. 
- Groucho Marx"

Allison Rich
Rare Materials Cataloguer
ESTC and NACO Coordinator

John Carter Brown Library
Providence, Rhode Island
[log in to unmask]

********************************