This sounds like a new situation I've never run into myself Ken. I don't think you have any choice but to follow your own suggestion because the Proj: fixed field only allows for one code. Naturally, make sure that the name of the projection appears in 255$b for each map, so at least our patrons will be able to know what was used when viewing a record. I think your suggestion works the best -- code for the first named map in the title proper. Paige ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Grabach" <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:20:29 AM Subject: Cataloging quesiton, fixed field Interesting situation has come up, that I have never dealt with in several years of cataloging maps. Two maps on one sheet, both sides, with each having a different projection. Each is titled separately, so would the Fixed Field be coded for the first named title? And not concern myself in the Fixed Field for the other code? The map in question is the new ITMB map of Ethiopia & Eritrea, both previously published separately. Ethiopia has Universal Transverse Mercator projection; Eritrea has Lambert Con formal Conic projection. I've encountered many with separate scale and coordinate statements in 255 fields, reflected in separate 034 fields. But different projection statements is new for me. My inclination is to code for the Ethiopia (first named) map in the Fixed Field. Any other insights are welcome. -- Ken Grabach Maps Librarian BEST Library, 219D Miami University Libraries Oxford, OH 45056 USA 513-529-1726