Correct me if I'm wrong Chris, but an original input is the symbol in the first position in the 040 field? So, if "UPM" appears first in the 040 string it says that Penn State created the master record, any other symbols after that are other institutions (or even the same one) making some kind of change to the master record at a later date. 

Paige 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Angela R Cope" <[log in to unmask]> 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:50:58 PM 
Subject: Re: map cataloging statistics, 2015 



Hi Chris, 




Is there a way to isolate out which ones are original records versus copy cataloging? 




Angie 


From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Christopher Winters <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:08 AM 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [MAPS-L] map cataloging statistics, 2015 


University of Texas = IXA (the Austin campus) only. 



You can generate analogous numbers for any institution by doing a search on dt="map" and li:[CODE] in an "advanced" or "expert" search. OCLC says the correct code for the University of Texas at Arlington is IUA. A search on dt="map" and li:IUA yields 11261--but it's not July 15 any longer. 



Chris Winters 

University of Chicago Library 

From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Wagner, Leslie A [[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 9:14 AM 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: map cataloging statistics, 2015 



Does the figure for the University of Texas represent only UT – Austin? Or does it include figures for the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) and perhaps other University of Texas System locations? The figures 2010-2013 show a bulge in numbers that correlates with the number of original cartographic records that I contributed to OCLC during an intense cartographic digitization project for which I served as cataloger. 



If statistics are available separately for the University of Texas at Arlington, I’d be interested in knowing the numbers. 




Leslie Wagner 

Metadata Archivist 

Access & Discovery 

University of Texas at Arlington Libraries 

817-272-6209 

[log in to unmask] 











From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christopher Winters 
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 2:47 PM 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: map cataloging statistics, 2015 





I started compiling statistics showing the number of "cartographic-materials" 
records on OCLC by institution in 2001 and have kept generating similar statistics 
every year since. 

I've shared the numbers with some of you over the years, and I sent them to MAPS-L 
in 2007. It seemed time to share them again. The 2015 numbers are at 

http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/collections/maps/map_cataloging_stats_2005-2015.pdf 


If you're interested, you might want to check the MAPS-L archives for my comments on 
the statistics then, as well as other folks' observations. Briefly, these statistics are 
only a measure of libraries' success in getting records to OCLC. The numbers are 
heavily influenced by many factors, including, for example, how libraries treat sets. 
Institutions that "analyze" sets of topos, nautical charts, and flood insurance maps 
are going to be overrepresented in proportion to how much material they've actually 
cataloged. Libraries that don't even analyze monographic series (like the USGS I 
series) will be underrepresented. There are numerous other factors that affect these 
numbers. The table probably needs dozens of footnotes explaining odd figures. 


Also, please forgive my focus on big U.S. libraries. If I were to start compiling similar 
figures today, I'd certainly include more institutions. 


You should realize that I've been compiling these statistics for annual reports. 
They're as accurate as I could make them, but of course I wouldn't have been as 
inclined to gather these numbers together if they didn't make the University of 
Chicago Map Collection look good. Be cynical if you want. It's very unlikely by the 
way that we'll be adding anything like as many records in future years. There are 
now only a few pockets of uncataloged materials in the collection. 


Do feel free to ask questions or to make comments. 


Chris Winters 
University of Chicago Library 
[log in to unmask]