If you do choose to include that info (or fill those subfields when you don't have that info), you should use the terminology

264 _0 $a [Place of production not identified] : $b [producer not identified], $c [date]

(RDA 2.7.2.6.5 and  2.7.4.7) 

Nancy

++++++++++++++

Nancy A. Kandoian
Map Cataloger
The Lionel Pincus and Princess Firyal Map Division, Room 117
Stephen A. Schwarzman Building
The New York Public Library
5th Avenue and 42nd Street
New York, New York 10018

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Michael Chopey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
This is covered by RDA 2.7:

Date of production is a core element for resources issued in an unpublished form. Other sub-elements of production statements are optional.

For manuscript materials, I haven't been including $a or $b in 264 _0.


Michael A. Chopey
Catalog Librarian
Hamilton 008
University of Hawaii at Manoa Libraries
Honolulu, HI  96822

phone (808) 956-2753
fax (808) 956-5968




On 4/20/2016 9:59 AM, Angela R Cope wrote:

I've been seeing some records for manuscript items (hand written, unpublished) with 264 _ 0 and $$a [Place of publication not identified] : $$b [publisher not identified]


This is confusing to me. Is this right? AACR2 didn't have a subfield a or b because the item wasn't published. 


Can someone tell me what is the correct way to do a 264 for manuscript items?


Thanks for the help.


Angie