We've been downsizing ever since I got here.  I haven't lost storage capacity yet though--because I did a careful evaluation when I arrived and determined that our flatfiles were 200% full.  So even though we've weeded something like 60,000 sheets (most topos, but there's been a lot of de-duping), thus far our upcoming renovation doesn't force me to throw away any maps cases.

Fewer and fewer places are keeping nation-wide topos.  

As for process and advice:  I think we've all been depending on the Force to guide us down to the size that our institutions are willing to make us.  I do fear, especially knowing how many collections, like mine, are not fully cataloged, that there are babies in that there bathwater.

-j

Jon Jablonski
Spatial Data Librarian, Map & Imagery Lab
Interim Director, Interdisciplinary Research Collaboratory
UCSB Library
805-893-4049

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Ball, Thelma <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Looking for information about parameters and guidelines for reducing map collections.

Re-purposing of space stated as reason for the need to downsize.


Are there any Illinois or other State universities that have input for this type of project?


Thanks,

Thelma

[log in to unmask]