Hi Phil, An Earth Sciences professor here at UC Riverside has created a tree atlas, for a large portion of California and Mexico, using Google Earth. Each file he created contains polygons representing the extent of a particular tree species. I don't know his exact methodology, but I do know he didn't have to create a new layer for each polygon he drafted! As it turns out, I'm trying to contact him about a different matter; if you'd like, I can ask him about his mapping methodology. I was also looking at the (DigitalGlobe) imagery for Chile in Bing Maps just now. The resolution is good, but my experience is that the imagery in Bing Maps tends to be less current than Google Earth (at least for the US). Best, Janet Reyes Geospatial Information Librarian UCR | Library PO Box 5900 Orbach Science Library, Room G59 Riverside, CA 92517-5900 Tel 951-827-6421 [log in to unmask] library.ucr.edu -----Original Message----- From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Philip White Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 3:51 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Aerial/Satellite Imagery of Chile Greetings, I am assisting a PhD student who is working on a GIS project quantifying the amount of built structures within certain high risk zones in several small municipalities in Chile. Neither he nor I have found building footprint data (OSM has some, but very incomplete coverage in these areas), and now he’s looking at heads up digitizing –which seems feasible because most of his zones are rather small and not densely developed… a test of a zone ended up having <1% human-made structures… Others could have up to 15% maybe. At any rate, the snag is finding imagery at high enough resolution to accurately digitize. I have searched USGS offerings on Earth Explorer, but these are not current enough nor at high enough resolution. SPOT has 1.5 m resolution imagery of the study area from this month, but it is $440 per image. My institution has some sort of partnership with DigitalGlobe that I’m trying to dig up more information on, but I think access is limited to certain people. So, would anyone happen to know of alternatives for high-res imagery in that part of the world? Is there a source I'm forgetting? Perhaps there is a source of aerial photographs in Chile that I’m not aware of? Another idea is to just use Google Earth Pro, which could be used for the heads up digitizing, and it has SPOT imagery for the study area dated within the past 6 months –it looks pretty good. Google says people can use Google Earth for non-commercial purposes. Does anyone have experience using imagery from Google Earth for research purposes? On the other hand, drawing polygons in Google Earth is not optimal: when you add a new individual polygon it is a separate layer. The end result would be exporting a bunch of single building footprints as individual KML files and merging them all into one layer in Arc or QGIS –doable but suboptimal. Along those lines, the imagery available as a basemap layer in ArcMap is dated (DigitalGlobe from 2010). We found new structures in the study areas that had been built since then. Or maybe heads up digitizing is not the best option… I’m open to suggestions. Thanks, Phil White _____________________ Philip B. White Earth Sciences and Environment Librarian, Assistant Professor Jerry Crail Johnson Earth Sciences & Map Library University Libraries University of Colorado Boulder 184 UCB Boulder, CO 80309 303-735-8278