I love you all. I want to say that the stone is the original and the rubbing is a reproduction. But then I think: we don¡¯t consider woodcuts to be reproductions of the wood blocks. What would Mary do? Jon Jablonski Director, Interdisciplinary Research Collaboratory Spatial Data Librarian, Map & Imagery Lab UCSB Library 805-893-4049 > On Jul 21, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Angela R Cope <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Exactly. And to add to the difficulty, I don't really know when my rubbing was made. So, can I copy catalog on LC's record? My map has many similarities in terms of marks but a few unique elements that ... make me think it was done at a different time than that held at LC. Yale has one too. It's the Yi ji tu and one other (I actually have two of them I'm trying to figure out). > > https://www.loc.gov/item/gm71005080/ <https://www.loc.gov/item/gm71005080/> > > > Angie > > > > From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Joel Kovarsky <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 6:26 AM > To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: [MAPS-L] Cataloging help - manuscript reproduction? > > Angie, > > I cannot speak for how the catalogers will see this, but might it be hard to assert that it is one of a kind? > > The process is not so unusual: https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199 <https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199>and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing> . > <https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199> > Search results from Map, 1100 to 1199 - Library of Congress <https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199> > www.loc.gov <http://www.loc.gov/> > Yu ji tu. Óí¼£Í¼. Stone rubbing dated 1903? One of the earliest stone maps, it consists of 5,110 grids, each grid is ... > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing> > Stone rubbing - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing> > en.wikipedia.org <http://en.wikipedia.org/> > Stone rubbing is the practice of creating an image of surface features of a stone on paper. The image records features such as natural textures, inscribed patterns or ... > > > Joel > > On 7/21/17 7:19 AM, Angela R Cope wrote: >> Hi have a map that is a rubbing from a stone. So, it's a one of a kind, hand done rubbing but a reproduction of a map on stone. >> >> So is it a manuscript or is the rubbing method simply the printing process? >> >> Help. >> >> Angie