----------------------------Original message---------------------------- Re: Blake Gumprecht's posting: > Anyone who believes Geographic Information Systems will replace > maps is as naive as the folks who think computers will replace > books. (etc.) "It's deja-vu all over again." What ever happened to all of those portable microfiche readers we were all going to be carrying around? Perhaps Apple will incorporate them into the "Newton." New technology often does things more quickly and efficiently; GIS applications in urban management and environmental studies are excellent examples. However, while markets and specialized niches for new technologies develop, older ones will continue and can even flourish. Paper and ink are still more portable and affordable than computers; they require no electricity nor technical training, can produce sublime art and subtle calculations, won't cause a flight control system to malfunction, and are unaffected by magnetic fields. In a thoughtful environment where perspective is valued, comments such as Blake's are enough to deal with the vaunted "death of maps." What I have had to confront for nearly three years is the use of this fabrication to rationalize disposing of the paper maps entirely. Ironically, the exciting rush to develop outstanding GIS and electronic mapping education here is juxtaposed with a relentless, documented growth in use of the "obselete" paper format, in part to support it. I find myself both justifying electronic-map-related purchases to Luddites and defending our paper collection from the rashness of "GIS Red Guards." I could go on, but shall opt for discretion. Suffice it for me to post my warning: beware of this particular "big lie" at your location. David Sauer ([log in to unmask]) Stone Science Library, College of Liberal Arts, Boston University