----------------------------Original message----------------------------
I agree. We don't need another one. I do not plan to subscribe (little
enough time to read MAPS-L) -- Phil Hoehn -- Univ. of California, Berkeley
Library ([log in to unmask])
 
On Wed, 9 Mar 1994 [log in to unmask] wrote:
 
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> I can't see the rel evance of duplication another MAPxyz-list... MAPS-L
> seems to be a good platform for discussion even the historical aspects
> in cartography.
> Of course, MAPS-L is "moderated" with a little "delay" in distribution.
> I am curious to learn about "new members for the new listserv list".
>
> F. Hoffmann /DD 23:45