----------------------------Original message----------------------------
One man's opinion.  I have just looked at, for the first time,
the new sheet index map - in this case of Massachusetts et al.
I DON't LIKE IT.  It is hard to spread out in order to look for
what you want.  It doesn't make clear the inddividual quads.
Mostly, however, it fails to recognize that, after 500 years,
the codex format has never been beaten.  Am I a voice crying in
the wilderness?   Chris DEvan